Expertise per Task: How a Business Gets a Strong Finance Professional for as Long as It Needs

A financial model for the bank, a review of a business before buying it, a management accounting setup: tasks like these come up a few times a year. We calculate what it costs to keep staff for them and what bringing in a specialist per task delivers.
Every business has two kinds of finance work. The first runs daily: source documents, payments, payroll, reporting. The second comes up a few times a year: a financial model for the bank, a review of a company before buying it, setting up management accounting. It calls for a professional of a different level, and the workload is short.
That raises a practical question. Keep such a professional on staff all year, or bring one in for the task?
Why Companies Used to Choose Staff
In 1937 the economist Ronald Coase explained why firms exist. Using the market is expensive: you have to find a contractor, agree on a price, bring them up to speed, and check the result. A company keeps in-house whatever is cheaper to organize itself. In 1991 Coase received the Nobel Prize for this work.
The heaviest part of those costs is context. An outsider needed months to learn how the business works, where the documents are, and why the books are kept the way they are. Hiring an employee who already knew all of it was simpler.
What Has Changed
Context now moves faster. A 1C export, bank statements, contracts and the accounting policy can be assembled into one package within a few days. AI-based tools help the contractor work through that package and get to the core of the task.
Howard Yu, author of the essay "Coase vs. Claude", describes the same shift using fashion. At Zara the unit of work was a collection. At Shein it became a single design decision. The smaller the unit, the easier it is to hand it to whoever does it best. He also cites Haier: about 80,000 employees work within more than 4,000 micro-enterprises, and each person's income depends on the value created for the customer.
In finance the unit of work has shrunk as well. One model. One review. One report for the board.
The Arithmetic
First, the cost of staff. The calculation uses the rates of Kazakhstan's 2026 Tax Code:
| Item | Monthly amount |
|---|---|
| Finance professional's take-home pay | KZT 500,000 |
| Gross salary | about KZT 615,000 |
| Salary with employer taxes and contributions | about KZT 715,000 |
| The same with workspace, software, training and vacation pay | about KZT 920,000 |
| Cost per year | about KZT 11 million |
The line-by-line calculation is in our article "Outsourcing vs. In-House Finance". As a market reference, hh.kz vacancies in Astana and Almaty offer a chief accountant between KZT 700,000 and 1,300,000 a month.
Now the cost of tasks. These are JB Solutions prices at the lower bound; the final figure is confirmed after a diagnostic:
| Task | Price |
|---|---|
| Financial model | from KZT 150,000 |
| Business plan for a bank or a Damu program | from KZT 250,000 |
| Financial due diligence before a deal | from KZT 300,000 |
| Management accounting setup | from KZT 350,000 |
| Monthly management accounting support | from KZT 400,000 per month |
| Fractional CFO | from KZT 750,000 per month |
It is too early to compare these tables directly. Answer one question first: for how many months a year would a professional of this level be fully loaded in your company? If the answer is "all year", calculate staff. If it is two or three months, calculate tasks.
What Task-Based Work Gives You Beyond Price
- •Level of the professional. The model for the bank is built by someone who builds them all the time. According to Deloitte's 2024 survey of more than 500 executives, access to skilled talent has become the leading reason to bring in external providers, alongside cost reduction.
- •Fast start. Hiring an employee takes one to three months. Task-based work starts after a diagnostic and a signed contract.
- •Experience from other industries. The team sees similar tasks across different clients and knows which questions a bank, an investor or a buyer will ask.
- •A second pair of eyes. A senior specialist reviews the result. An owner can rarely judge the quality of a financial model alone, and a built-in review closes that gap.
- •Knowledge stays in the company. When the task is done you hold the model, the report and the update guide. Once context is written down, the business depends less on one employee's memory.
- •Flexible volume. There is more work in season or before a deal and less in a quiet period. The cost follows the tasks.
There is academic support too. In 2025 Duong, Le and Giang surveyed 358 people from 176 small and medium-sized companies in Da Nang, Vietnam. Their finding: outsourced accounting services, both routine and advisory, improve compliance and management decisions, and through them business performance.
Where Staff Is Stronger
The candid answer: in daily work. Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu gives the example of an X-ray technician who switches between thirty different tasks in a day. A connected role like that needs a person on site. In finance this means source documents, payments, payroll and dealing with the tax authority.
The executive hiring market offers a second reference point: once the need for a finance director exceeds three days a week, a staff position becomes the better deal. A large company also needs a full-time CFO for negotiations with banks and investors.
So the working setup for a small or medium-sized business is usually mixed. Staff run the recurring operations. An external team takes the rare high-level tasks.
How to Share Context Safely
This approach has a price: the contractor needs access to your data. Researcher Soren Larson calls context one of the few truly scarce resources a business has, so it deserves to be treated as an asset.
Three practical rules:
- 1The confidentiality agreement is signed before the first file is shared.
- 2The contractor receives a package for the task, while access to the full database stays with you.
- 3Agree in advance where the data is processed and what happens to it once the work is delivered.
Four Questions Before You Decide
- 1Does the task repeat every day or come up a few times a year?
- 2Does the task have a clear result: a model, a report, an opinion?
- 3Can the context for it be collected into a package of documents?
- 4For how many months a year would a professional of this level be fully loaded?
Three answers of "rarely, with a clear result, the package can be assembled" mean the task is a sound candidate for an external team.
You can start with the free express diagnostic from JB Solutions: we look at your situation and tell you which tasks are worth keeping in-house and which to bring in for a result.
Sources
- •Ronald Coase. The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 1937
- •Howard Yu. Coase vs. Claude and The Future of the Firm
- •Soren Larson. Against The Coasean Singularity, March 21, 2026
- •Deloitte Global Outsourcing Survey 2024
- •Duong, Le, Giang. The role of outsourced accounting services in enhancing SMEs’ business performance, 2025
- •MIT Technology Review: interview with Daron Acemoglu, May 11, 2026
- •Hunt Scanlon: Fractional vs. Full-Time Executives
- •hh.kz: chief accountant vacancies, October 2026
- •Tax Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2026 edition: rates of income tax, pension, health insurance and social contributions
Related service
Express Financial Diagnostics
An independent look at your finances in 5 days: 3-5 findings and a plan for what to fix first